Note: The Lawrence Times runs opinion columns and letters to the Times written by community members with varying perspectives on local issues. These pieces do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Times staff.
Would you like to send a letter to the Times? Great! Here’s how to do it.
Shall the following be adopted?
Shall the City of Lawrence, Kansas, abandon the Commission-Manager form of government and adopt a Modified Mayor-Council Manager form of government and become a city operating under a Modified Mayor-Council Manager form of government?
Yes?
No?
Hello neighbors. The Lawrence Association of Neighborhoods is writing to state our position on the vote to change how our city commission is comprised as adopted by Resolution 7442.
We are opposed to this ballot question for the following reasons.
Related news article:
• What Lawrence’s ballot question on the city’s ‘form of government’ actually means, Oct. 9, 2024
To start, the wording of the ballot question is vague and creates confusion. One look at a sample ballot makes it plain to see there is plenty of space for further explanation on Resolution 7442.
Within Resolution 7442 is a change from five to six commissioners and a directly elected mayor, with four of the commissioners representing districts.
Adding districts to Lawrence will add further political divisions in our community that we do not support. Our current model allows every citizen in Lawrence to engage with every city commissioner. All five commissioners are accountable to Lawrence. We see the possibility of lower voter turnout with a district model in Lawrence as fewer elected officials would be accountable to voters, especially during the election years when a vote for mayor is not on the ballot.
The change to a directly elected mayor does not align with our city’s creation of a strategic plan built via community input. One person’s vision does not override the community’s collective work. Although some may find our annual rotation of the mayor position odd, this rotational model keeps individuals or special interest groups from becoming entrenched via board and commission appointments.
The wording of Resolution 7442 is nonbinding. A “yes” vote will allow the city commission a free hand to write the ordinance as they feel fit. There is a possibility the ordinance could have added powers beyond those listed within Resolution 7442. We do not support giving the city commission this level of authority to reform our governing structure.
The Lawrence Association of Neighborhoods membership regularly attends and participates in public meetings. We have carefully considered and discussed this change of governance vote to determine our support.
We are voting “no” on this ballot question.
We ask that you join us in voting “no.”
— Lawrence Association of Neighborhoods
Holly Joyce, chair, and Kyle Thompson, treasurer
Don’t miss a beat … Click here to sign up for our email newsletters
Click here to learn more about our newsletters first
More Community Voices:
Letter to the Times: City should create oversight committee to guide pool renovation project, rebuild trust
”Our petition’s 1,764 signatures, our supporters’ 75 letters, and our research into the extensive flaws in the (pool renovation) community engagement process all indicate that the previously proposed plan did not reflect public opinion,” Holly Krebs writes in this letter to the Times.
Shawn Alexander: Say his name – Fred Harvey Smith (Column)
”Racial violence has been omnipresent in American history, and in far too many of the incidents, the perpetrators of the crime are acquitted or not even brought up on charges. When I think of such cases I am often haunted by the heinous murder of Fred Harvey Smith here in the land of John Brown in May 1936,” Shawn Alexander writes in this column.
Letter to the Times: Are veterans’ sacrifices for democracy worthless?
”My father (Navy), mother (Army), and many other family members served our country in World War II. … They gave of themselves, in countless ways, to stop the spread of authoritarianism, suppression of freedoms and tyranny of the many by the few,” Sandy Sanders writes in this letter to the Times.
Was our election guide helpful to you?
How can we do it better next time?
Please let us know by taking our quick survey at this link.
Mackenzie Clark/Lawrence Times
