Letter to the Times: Douglas County should adopt a tenants’ right to counsel

Share this post or save for later

Note: The Lawrence Times runs opinion columns and letters to the Times written by community members with varying perspectives on local issues. These pieces do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Times staff.

Would you like to send a letter to the Times? Great! Here’s how to do it.

If you’re charged with a felony, you have the right to an attorney. If you’re about to be kicked out of your home here in Douglas County, you’re on your own. 

According to a national advocacy group, only 3% of tenants are represented by lawyers in eviction proceedings. Landlords? Eighty-one percent. 

Most tenants are unprepared to navigate a complex legal process on their own. Even if a tenant isn’t too overwhelmed or scared to battle a trained attorney in court, deciphering the law can be an insurmountable challenge. 

Just how difficult is it for many tenants to understand and assert their rights in eviction cases? A study in Baltimore found that 80% of unrepresented tenants had a potential legal defense to eviction, but only 8% asserted that defense. 

Unsurprisingly, research confirms that represented tenants are much more likely to remain housed. In California, a study found that represented tenants were nearly four times more likely to remain in their homes. A study in Denver found that more than 80% of represented tenants stayed in their homes, compared to just 32% of unrepresented tenants in private (nonpublic) housing and 57% in public housing. A Minnesota study determined that represented tenants were twice as likely to remain housed. Additional studies show similar striking results. 

Ninety-seven percent of tenants, of course, aren’t represented by counsel. But over the last few years, several states and localities have leveled the playing field by providing tenants with a right to counsel in eviction proceedings. 

Kansas City, Missouri, is one of the most recent jurisdictions to adopt a tenants’ right to counsel, passing such an ordinance in December 2021. Kansas City joins at least a dozen other American cities that have adopted a tenants’ right to counsel since 2017, including diverse jurisdictions such a New York, Boulder, New Orleans, Louisville, Denver and Toledo. Three states — Washington, Connecticut, and Maryland — have also adopted a tenants’ right to counsel.

Establishing a tenants’ right to counsel sounds like an expensive endeavor, but it ultimately saves money. A national financial services firm has analyzed the “return on investment” of establishing a tenants’ right to counsel and concluded that it will save $3 to $6 for each dollar invested. Keeping more tenants housed, the firm says, results in “significant cost savings … related to emergency shelter costs, transitional housing and re-housing costs, emergency healthcare and other costs associated with homelessness, foster care costs, and impacts to the education system.”

We can sharply reduce homelessness by telling Douglas County tenants, “You have the right to an attorney.” It’s time for Douglas County to join Kansas City and other jurisdictions around the country by adopting a tenants’ right to counsel. 

— Steven Koprince (he/him), Lawrence

Don’t miss a beat … Click here to sign up for our email newsletters


Click here to learn more about our newsletters first

Click here to find out how to send a letter to the Times

More Community Voices:

Holly Krebs: Lawrence community deserves transparency and a voice on city budget, debt (Column)

Share this post or save for later

“Because we believe our community would benefit from more public discussions about these important issues, our coalition will independently host a community conversation about the Lawrence city budget,” Holly Krebs, of the Coalition for Collaborative Governance, writes in this column.

Max Kautsch: Kansas Legislature’s supermajority makes mockery of open records law over efficiency portal messages (Column)

Share this post or save for later

“This iteration of the Legislature seems to think it is entitled to redact information that could traditionally be found in a phonebook, and that it may do so in a futile attempt to shield the identity of a handful of powerful Kansans but not the rest of us,” Max Kautsch writes in this Kansas Reflector column.

MORE …

Previous Article

Longtime teacher, coach selected as Lawrence High assistant principal

Next Article

Lawrence community leaders raise questions about plan for road and roundabout to nowhere